State response to social protests: exploring the dynamics of civil society and state dialogue

Abstract

Protests frequently emerge as a manifestation of societal grievances, shedding light on various challenges faced by the population. In response, governments can adopt diverse strategies to address these issues. These include engaging in dialogue with protest organizers to negotiate solutions and implement policy changes, or employing repressive measures such as deploying security forces, imposing curfews, or restricting assembly rights.

This study examines the state's response to the social protests that erupted following the 2019 presidential election in Kazakhstan. While previous research has explored triggers, key actors, and barriers to social mobilization in Central Asia, particularly Kazakhstan, this study adopts a novel approach. Utilizing content analysis of presidential speeches and video analysis of protests, it assesses the state's reaction. The findings reveal that the immediate response to the protests was marked by legal restrictions and suppression. In contrast, the state's long-term strategy involved attempts to address the socio-economic demands of the protesters through dialogue and accommodation.

The study illustrates a complex and evolving interaction between the state and civil society in Kazakhstan. The state's response combined both conciliatory and repressive measures, tailored to the specific circumstances and perceived threat levels of the protests. This dual approach enabled the state to maintain control while demonstrating a readiness to engage with societal concerns through negotiation.